Abortion! Yeah, I Said It.

January 9, 2008 / by godsblog

Think of me as your bridge between the manipulation and hyperbole of modern American speech and the dictionary. I know the corporations, network TV cartoonism, Hollywood, suburban moms, Evangelical zealots, Oprah, politicians on both sides and homeschoolers have all worked to degrade the language, general knowledge and truth. Global climate change to describe global warming, Bush's clean skies initiative, the war on terror, socialism, Liberal, conservative have been abused, politicized or reframed to demonize or hide intentions. Perhaps no word has been abused as much as choice. So in today's class boy's and girls we will cover the word choice.

The American Heritage College Dictionary(It was the most patriotic dictionary I could find, until Pat Robertson writes the Jesus Spoke to me while I was wrapped Naked in the American Flag while masturbating to a picture of George Bush on a Thousand Dollar Bill Dictionary) defines CHOICE as: THE ACT OF CHOOSING; SELECTION. THE POWER, RIGHT OR LIBERTY TO CHOOSE; OPTIONS. A NUMBER-NUMBER-NUMBER OR VARIETY FROM WHICH TO CHOOSE.

The anti abortion crowd frequently enjoys the freedom to choose, without granting that privilege to others. they choose the course for others lives. They choose to impose their values by trying to erase or stifle the opinions of others through legislation or through selective religious guilt. They choose to call abortion doctors BABY killers, and those who champion a woman's right to make profoundly important decisions concerning their own life and health as pro-abortion.

No one is PRO abortion. No one gets up and says hey, lets yank a fetus out of a woman today. Whew-hoo, party! Pro-choice means not imposing your religious or moral values on someone else. And it isn't murder. If your definition was so broad and all-encompassing to include abortion as murder than you wouldn't also be FOR war and the death penalty. Read a book, mind your own business, climb down from your ivory SUV and teach values you hold sacred to your children instead of forcing everyone that doesn't see the world through your eyes and your experiences into some moral and social gulag

Its true what they say. This is better than therapy. I need a nap.

9 comments on Abortion! Yeah, I Said It.

  • vladimir said 7 months ago
    I agree with the general direction of your opinion, but I have to take exception to the non sequiturs about war and death penalty. That argument can be turned back on you so that you have to address issues related to appeals lasting decades and then would you still be willing to kill the former fetus once its appeals ran out. War is an inevitable consequence of living in a world of competing interests and ideologies. I don't think anyone is any more pro-war than pro-abortion, either. That's why it's adequate to leave the issue alone and judge it on its own merits without dragging in other issues that are unrelated to personal freedom and conscience. Sweet dreams.
  • godsblog said 7 months ago
    good point, and I appreciate the argument. What I was refering to was the hypocrisy of being pro-life in some things and not in others. If one is truly pro-life, then all life is sacred. Sort of like saying thou shall not steal, except for...One must either admit that life is complex and nuanced, as is inherent in the term choice, it is only black and white, and that is a world none of us can face honestly.
  • vladimir said 7 months ago
    Again, those are non sequiturs. Apples and oranges. Capital punishment, at least in the US, is generally reserved for the worst criminals who get due process and who've committed violent, heinous atrocities against others. It's not something carried out by one person like, "You know what, I can't live with this prisoner any longer so I should terminate him." It's far from a unilateral decision made in a relatively short span of time -- you have juries, trial and appellate judges, and a Supreme Court to oversee the whole process and it usually takes many years to carry it out.

    War likewise (using the US as an example) requires either a declaration by Congress or their tacit approval under war powers acts. Not unilateral decisions to go bomb places and cause strife. It's a collective power, not an issue of personal liberty or caprice. And, yes, that includes current US military actions. Congress gave this administration authorization to conduct these actions.

    In contrast, abortion is a very private matter that affects a pregnant female and/or her family and those around her should *she* want to consult them. Or not. It's unilateral. It's her choice. It's about the right of one individual to choose when she has a child. It's not a collective decision, it's a matter of personal liberty.

    I understand what you're trying to get at, but these issues aren't moral equivalents or absolutes (and most pro-lifers aren't fringe absolutists who would deny abortions to save mother's lives or in cases of rape or incest). A fetus isn't a rapist-murderer isn't a nation that bombs Pearl Harbor. The arguments about each of those is unique, but you're muddling the central one about personal liberty as if it relates to the other two. We treat rapist-murderers very differently from anyone else in society: we either lock them up for a very long time or we execute them after a very long time. We treat those who threaten us very differently from those who don't. If a nation attacks us or threatens us, we have an obligation to fight back and defend ourselves. But the right to choose when to have a child has absolutely nothing to do with issues of criminal justice (death penalty) or national sovereignty (war).

    Most people are no more pro-war than they are pro-abortion, and I don't think most people would personally want to be present at an execution despite the outrage over crimes that receive a lot of attention or support for the death penalty. While I agree with you on the issue of choice, bringing up bad analogies only muddles the message about a personal liberty issue. It's not hypocritical to see these issues distinctly since they *are* distinct.
  • shelmadine said 7 months ago
    Read without comment. That doesn't mean I don't have an opinion one way or the other. Blogging is a poor man's shrink.[COOL]
  • godsblog said 7 months ago
    and the check is in the mail, Shel.
  • ekyprogressive said 7 months ago
    [THUMBUP][COOL][THUMBUP] The real mantra of most of these people are spare the fetus, but once its out of the womb, to hell with it...At least that is the message they really seem to send.
  • godsblog said 7 months ago
    Thanks EK, of course abortion is wrong, they say, but not reto-active abortion when that kid grows up in awful circumstances and makes poor decisions from that tough start.
  • myshelties3 said 7 months ago
    Cardinal Bernadine of Chicago used to call it "The Whole Cloth Doctrine". One can't be for one (war and execution) and against another (abortion). It is not logical or moral.
    Roe v Wade was decided as a matter of privacy: as in the 4th amendment in the Bill of Rights.
    There are terms for trying to split so many hairs and not go bald (so to speak) it is called cognitive dissonance.
    Well written and I agree with everything you wrote on this issue.[THUMBUP]
  • godsblog said 7 months ago
    Of course you agree. It was brilliant![LOL][LOL][LOL]

Add a comment

To add comments without entering your email and image verification, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster

  • Type the words in the box below the image.

Email this blog post to a friend

To email posts to friends, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster

Friends

View All